OIL

Middle East Conflict Threatens Global Energy Security as Oil Flows Collapse and Prices Surge

Global energy markets face mounting instability as geopolitical conflict, rising electricity demand, extreme weather events and concentrated supply chains create significant pressure on energy production and distribution worldwide. The disruptions have rippled across natural gas, oil and electricity markets, prompting governments to prioritize energy security concerns following major disruptions over the past five years, including pandemic-related supply chain disruptions, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, trade restrictions on critical minerals and conflicts in major energy-producing regions, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). The vulnerability of global energy systems is starkly illustrated by the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea.

During 2025, approximately 20 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products transited the strait daily, representing roughly 25% of the world's seaborne oil trade. Qatar and the United Arab Emirates also transport sufficient liquefied natural gas through the waterway to account for approximately 19% of global LNG trade, according to the IEA. Recent Middle East conflict has dramatically reduced traffic flows through this strategic chokepoint.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported a precipitous decline in oil volumes, falling from 21.6 million barrels per day in the fourth quarter of 2025 to 4.9 million barrels per day in the second quarter of 2026. This disruption underscores how dependence on limited transportation routes can trigger energy market consequences extending far beyond the conflict region itself.

The economic ramifications have extended substantially beyond crude oil markets. The World Bank projected that average energy prices would increase 24% during 2026 as Middle East conflict disrupted oil and natural gas supplies. The bank also forecast Brent crude oil to average $86 per barrel throughout the year, approximately $26 higher than its January projection.

Rising energy costs propagate through transportation, manufacturing and agriculture sectors, as petroleum and natural gas serve not only as fuels but also as essential inputs in the production and distribution of other commodities. Low-income nations face disproportionate vulnerability to these disruptions. In April 2026, leaders of the IEA, International Monetary Fund and World Bank issued a joint statement emphasizing that Middle East energy shocks were disproportionately affecting countries with heavy dependence on imported energy.

Elevated prices for oil, natural gas and fertilizer can escalate costs throughout entire economies and contribute to inflation concerns and food price instability. Global electricity consumption continues accelerating. The IEA forecasts that global electricity demand will increase 3.6% in 2026 and 3.8% in 2027, following a 3% increase in 2025.

Industrial expansion, electric vehicle adoption, air conditioning expansion, heat pumps, household appliances and growing data center capacity are primary drivers of rising electricity consumption. Climate conditions amplify these pressures significantly. The IEA reported that global electricity demand increased 4.4% in 2024, when intense heat waves drove greater electricity use across numerous regions.

Higher temperatures simultaneously increase air conditioning demand while power systems already operate under stress. Extreme weather events additionally threaten energy infrastructure and electricity generation capacity, creating substantial uncertainty for nations attempting to maintain reliable electrical grids. Expanding renewable energy deployment may reduce certain forms of energy dependence, as solar and wind generation eliminate requirements for continuous fuel imports such as oil or natural gas.

However, the energy transition introduces different supply chain vulnerabilities. Solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries and associated technologies depend on minerals and manufactured components concentrated in a limited number of countries. The IEA reported that the leading refining country accounted for an average 72% of refined supply for major energy minerals, excluding rare earths, in 2025.

China dominates the refining operations for numerous critical minerals while Indonesia leads in refined nickel supply. Export restrictions have amplified these concentration risks. China implemented export controls on several heavy rare earth elements in 2025, while the Democratic Republic of the Congo introduced restrictions affecting cobalt supplies.

Clean energy manufacturing shows similarly concentrated patterns. China commands approximately 85% of solar supply chain production capacity and 80% of lithium-ion battery supply chain capacity, according to the IEA. China's dominance intensifies to approximately 95% for photovoltaic wafers and 97% for battery anode materials.

Concentration at such scale means that disruptions in one major producing nation can cascade through projects and industries across numerous countries worldwide. These risks do not necessarily indicate that renewable energy expansion makes energy systems less secure. Rather, they demonstrate that energy security evolves alongside technological change.

While oil-dependent economies face vulnerability at shipping routes such as the Strait of Hormuz, economies developing substantial renewable generation capacity may increasingly focus on access to copper, lithium, graphite, rare earth elements and manufacturing capacity. A more resilient global energy system will likely require multiple energy sources rather than heavy reliance on single fuels, countries or transportation routes. The environmental transition could diminish certain fossil fuel-related risks while simultaneously requiring governments and industries to address vulnerabilities in technologies and materials that will power future global economic systems.

Sources: International Energy Agency (IEA), U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Source: hwchronicle.com

Would you like to discuss this with one of our FT Specialists?

FT Mercati services can be tried free of charge for 15 days, with no obligation. Fill in the form and we will get back to you as soon as possible.